Search for: "1ST RATE REALTY" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2009, 8:00 am
That being said, it couldn't possibly have been worse than 1Q09 during which we saw the paralysis of 4Q08 manifest itself in a 1st quarter volume which we needed a microscope to see. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Servs., LLC v Rubin, Fiorella & Friedman, LLP, 188 AD3d 530, 531 [1st Dept 2020], quoting McCoy, 99 NY2d at 301, citing King Tower Realty Corp. v G & G Funding Corp., 163 AD3d 541 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 2:25 pm by Jim W Hildreth
There is a exemption, that is a value to the local consumer, starting January 1st 2012, the individual parties can turn to their local California Superior Court, Small Claims Division as long as the dispute does not exceed $10,000, previously is was $7,500.This process is quicker, cost effective and timely.In addition many small claims courts may have a panel of mediators available to act as a mediator or neutral.As an example the Tuolumne County Superior Court has a active mediation panel… [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  Obviously, the Rothko rule can greatly augment a plaintiff's damage award when the asset being valued appreciates at a rate higher than the pre-judgment interest rate (9%) between the transaction date and the time of trial which usually takes places many years later. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 8:00 am
This figure is greater than that seen in any year since 1992 and, what is most troubling, almost half of these have occured since July 1st. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 7:16 am by Scott J. Kreppein, Esq.
Slip Op. 50406(U) (Nassau County, 1st Dist., March 6, 2009); Clinton Realty, LLC v. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 3:13 am by John Hochfelder
The defense argued in summation that the $16,000,000 for future medical expenses suggested by plaintiff's experts was outrageously high and the product of incredible testimony, calculations and growth rates. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
Last week, in Matter of Pokoik v 575 Realties, Inc., 2016 NY Slip Op 06648 [1st Dept Oct. 11, 2016], in a decision of apparent first impression, the First Department again reversed a lower court ruling denying inspection rights and held that the petitioner was entitled under the common law to inspect records of the corporation’s wholly-owned subsidiary. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Goldome Realty Credit Corp., 593 So. 2d 1135, 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (providing that where the borrower filed for bankruptcy after a default judgment of foreclosure, the lender was able to sever its claim for enforcement of the personal guaranty and pursue the personal guarantor). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Goldome Realty Credit Corp., 593 So. 2d 1135, 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (providing that where the borrower filed for bankruptcy after a default judgment of foreclosure, the lender was able to sever its claim for enforcement of the personal guaranty and pursue the personal guarantor). [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:50 am by Austin T. Hamilton, Esq.
Goldome Realty Credit Corp., 593 So. 2d 1135, 1136 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (providing that where the borrower filed for bankruptcy after a default judgment of foreclosure, the lender was able to sever its claim for enforcement of the personal guaranty and pursue the personal guarantor). [read post]
Leon Betesh/Park Seen Realty Assocs., 115 A.D.2d 381, 381 (1st Dep’t 1985) (overturning a Special Term’s denial of a Yellowstone injunction because the Special Term applied the criteria for obtaining a preliminary injunction, rather than the Yellowstone standard) [read post]
6 Aug 2011, 2:27 pm by Law Lady
District Court Judge William Alsup of the Northern District of California said a policy by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London might cover California Mortgage & Realty's alleged negligence in remitting funds or servicing investments. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Albert, 47 AD3d 482 (1st Dept 2008) (read here my post on Vick), standing for the proposition that the shares of a real estate holding company are least suited to DLOM. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:26 am by Peter Mahler
With the suit still pending, in 2019 the sisters agreed to sell the LLC’s realty for $5.25 million. [read post]